4.5 Article

ANAMMOX performance, granulation, and microbial response under COD disturbance

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 139-148

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4298

Keywords

extracellular polymeric substances; ANAMMOX; organic substrates; confocal laser scanning microscopy

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 21276114]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP111A12]
  3. National Science and technology support project [2011BAC11B05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDANAMMOX (ANaerobic AMMonium OXidation), a promising process for biological nitrogen removal, is usually affected by organic matter. In order to fully understand the effect of chemical oxygen demand (COD) on the ANAMMOX process, reactor performance, granular characteristics and microbial response were evaluated systematically under glucose stimulation. RESULTSHigh removal efficiencies of ammonium and total nitrogen (> 90%) were achieved with 100 mg L-1 COD concentration. ANAMMOX contribution was reduced to only 69% as COD concentration was increased to 300 mg L-1. The granulation, EPS contents, TB-EPS/LB-EPS and protein/carbohydrate were increased at a specific COD, with higher COD disrupting the biofacies structure. The results also showed that EPS distribution and microbial structure were affected by the organic disturbance. CONCLUSIONAn appropriate COD concentration enhanced the total nitrogen removal during ANAMMOX process, by enabling a stable synergism between ANAMMOX bacteria and heterotrophic denitrificans. Furthermore, a proper COD stimulation promoted sludge granulation by influencing EPS composition and distribution. However, excessive COD disturbance disrupted the highly efficient biofacies structure and microbial balance, which then decreased the ANAMMOX competitiveness. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available