4.5 Article

Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of Cu2+, Cd2+, Ni2+, Pb2+, Fe2+, and Zn2+ removal from aqueous solution using microwaved olive stone activated carbon

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 12, Pages 2141-2151

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4073

Keywords

activated carbon; heavy metals adsorption; microwave; olive stone; response surface methodology (RSM)

Funding

  1. Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) [8045048]
  2. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia [203/PKT/670006, 03-01-05-SF0502]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDThe efficiencies of removal of Cu2+, Cd2+, Ni2+, Pb2+, Fe2+, and Zn2+ from aqueous solution with olive stone activated carbon (OSAC) were investigated in this work. A central composite design (CCD) method was used to optimize the preparation of OSAC using microwave assisted potassium hydroxide. RESULTSThe optimum conditions obtained were 565W radiation power, 7min radiation time, and 1.87 impregnation ratio. This resulted in 98.55% removal of Cu2+, 95.32% of Cd2+, 98.19% of Ni2+ 98.83% of Pb2+, 99.32% of Fe2+, 98.36% of Zn2+, and 85.15% of OSAC yield. The surface characteristics of the AC prepared under optimized conditions were examined by pore structure analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The BET surface area, total pore volume and average pore diameter of the prepared AC were 1280.71m(2)g(-1), 0.604cm(3)g(-1) and 4.63nm, respectively. The equilibrium data of the adsorption was well fitted to the Langmuir equation and the highest value of adsorption capacity (Q) on the OSAC was found for Fe2+ (62.50mgg(-1)), followed by Pb2+ (23.47mgg(-1)), Cu2+ (22.73mgg(-1)), Zn2+ (15.08mgg(-1)), Ni2+ (12.00mgg(-1)), and Zn2+ (11.72mgg(-1)). CONCLUSIONSOSAC prepared by microwaves can be used for the removal of metals from contaminated wastewater. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available