4.5 Article

A comparison of N-doped TiO2 photocatalysts preparation methods and studies on their catalytic activity

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 10, Pages 1815-1821

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4029

Keywords

N-doped TiO2; photocatalysis; visible light; the Reactive Red-Violet; kinetics

Funding

  1. Key Basic Research of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [11JC1400100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51108070, 51178093]
  3. Shanghai Pujiang Program
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND N-doped TiO2 can narrow the TiO2 forbidden band and thereby increase its catalytic activity under visible light. In this work, three methods (the sol-gel method (SG), the tetrabutyl titanate hydrolysis precipitation method TN', and the H2O2-modified method (TNH)) were used to prepare N-doped TiO2 photocatalysts. The Reactive Red-Violet dye (KN-R) was used as the target pollutant. The catalytic activities of the photocatalysts prepared via the three methods were compared and studied. RESULTS The structures and optoelectronic properties of these catalysts were characterized by various means. The results demonstrated that the N-doped TiO2 catalyst synthesized using the TNH method exhibited the most efficient catalytic activity under visible light and produced a degradation rate of 90% for the Reactive Red-Violet dye. The N-doped TiO2 prepared using the SG method exhibited the lowest catalytic activity under both UV and visible light. The kinetics of photocatalysis degradation for KN-R by N-doped TiO2 prepared by TNH method was studied and found to be zero order due to the good adsorption effect between KN-R and TiO2. CONCLUSION The N-doped TiO2 prepared by TNH method showed good photocatalytic activity in the case of degrading dye under both UV and visible light. (C) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available