4.5 Article

Differential fatty acid profiles of Chlorella kessleri grown with organic materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 651-657

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.3881

Keywords

Chlorella kessleri; fatty acid; glucose; glycerol; mixotrophic

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50904051]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Yantai, China [2010247]
  3. open fund of Shandong Oriental Ocean Sci-Tech Co., Ltd [200803]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Integration of oleaginous microalgae cultivation with wastewater treatment is considered a low-cost approach for manufacturing algae-based biodiesel. However, autotrophic microalgae cannot survive in organic wastewater where the effluent is usually turbid and sunlight cannot penetrate into the wastewater. Thus mixotrophic microalgae should be explored. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential of using mixotrophic Chlorella kessleri to produce fatty acids from organic materials. RESULTS: Results revealed that mixotrophic C. kessleri fatty acids display much greater productions (up to 54.67% of cell dry weight) and more suitable compositions for biodiesel production (moderate carbon chain length mainly with C16 and C18, down to 1.17 delta/mol of unsaturation degree) than autotrophic ones. A suitable final pH (near neutral) after nitrate-depletion and a high organic carbon consumption seemed to be the key factors manipulating fatty acids production under whichever organic substrate tested. CONCLUSION: These characteristics increase the acceptability in using mixotrophic C. kessleri as a potential easy-control candidate in biodiesel production. If fed with available organic effluent of wastewater as the nutrient supply, C. kessleri may have great potential for profitable biodiesel. (c) 2012 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available