4.5 Article

Simultaneous sulfide and acetate oxidation under denitrifying conditions using an inverse fluidized bed reactor

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 9, Pages 1197-1203

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.1921

Keywords

denitrification; elemental sulfur; inverse fluidized bed reactor; sulfide oxidation

Funding

  1. NSF-CONACYT [35982-U]
  2. CONACYT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous removal of sulfur, nitrogen and carbon compounds from wastewaters is a commercially important biological process. The objective was to evaluate the influence of the CH3COO-/NO3- molar ratio on the sulfide oxidation process using an inverse fluidized bed reactor (IFBR). RESULTS: Three molar ratios of CH3COO-/NO3- (0.85, 0.72 and 0.62) with a constant S2-/NO3- molar ratio of 0.13 were evaluated. At a CH3COO-/NO3- molar ratio of 0.85, the nitrate, acetate and sulfide removal efficiencies were approximately 100%. The N-2 yield (g N-2 g(-1) NO3--N consumed) was 0.81. Acetate was mineralized, resulting in a yield of 0.65 g inorganic-C g(-1) CH3COO--C Consumed. Sulfide was partially oxidized to S-0, and 71% of the S2- consumed was recovered as elemental sulfur by a settler installed in the IFBR. At a CH3COO-/NO3- molar ratio of 0.72, the efficiencies of nitrate, acetate and sulfide consumption were of 100%, with N-2 and inorganic-C yields of 0.84 and 0.69, respectively. The sulfide was recovered as sulfate instead of S-0, with a yield of 0.92 g SO42--S g(-1) S2- consumed. CONCLUSIONS: The CH3COO-/NO3- molar ratio was shown to be an important parameter that can be used to control the fate of sulfide oxidation to either S-0 or sulfate. In this study, the potential of denitrification for the simultaneous removal of organic matter, sulfide and nitrate from wastewaters was demonstrated, obtaining CO2, S-0 and N-2 as the major end products. (C) 2008 Society of Chemical Industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available