4.7 Article

Modelling non-adiabatic effects in H3+: Solution of the rovibrational Schrodinger equation with motion-dependent masses and mass surfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 141, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4897566

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) [NK83583]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introducing different rotational and vibrational masses in the nuclear-motion Hamiltonian is a simple phenomenological way to model rovibrational non-adiabaticity. It is shown on the example of the molecular ion H-3(+), for which a global adiabatic potential energy surface accurate to better than 0.1 cm(-1) exists [M. Pavanello, L. Adamowicz, A. Alijah, N. F. Zobov, I. I. Mizus, O. L. Polyansky, J. Tennyson, T. Szidarovszky, A. G. Csaszar, M. Berg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 023002 (2012)], that the motion-dependent mass concept yields much more accurate rovibrational energy levels but, unusually, the results are dependent upon the choice of the embedding of the molecule-fixed frame. Correct degeneracies and an improved agreement with experimental data are obtained if an Eckart embedding corresponding to a reference structure of D-3h point-group symmetry is employed. The vibrational mass of the proton in H-3(+) is optimized by minimizing the root-mean-square (rms) deviation between the computed and recent high-accuracy experimental transitions. The best vibrational mass obtained is larger than the nuclear mass of the proton by approximately one third of an electron mass, m(opt,p)((v)) = m(nuc,p) + 0.31224 m(e). This optimized vibrational mass, along with a nuclear rotational mass, reduces the rms deviation of the experimental and computed rovibrational transitions by an order of magnitude. Finally, it is shown that an extension of the algorithm allowing the use of motion-dependent masses can deal with coordinate-dependent mass surfaces in the rovibrational Hamiltonian, as well. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available