4.7 Article

Theoretical assessment of graphene-metal contacts

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 138, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4807855

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish MICINN [FIS2008-02238, CTQ2012-30751, JCI-2010-06372]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009SGR1041, XRQTC]
  3. National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA)
  4. Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI)
  5. Commission on Higher Education, Ministry of Education
  6. Office of the Higher Education Commission, Thailand
  7. Spanish Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte [AP2009-3379]
  8. ICREA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene-metal contacts have emerged as systems of paramount importance in the synthesis of high-quality and large-size patches of graphene and as vital components of nanotechnological devices. Herein, we study the accuracy of several density functional theory methods using van der Waals functionals or dispersive forces corrections when describing the attachment of graphene on Ni(111). Two different experimentally observed chemisorption states, top-fcc and bridge-top, were put under examination, together with the hcp-fcc physisorption state. Calculated geometric, energetic, and electronic properties were compared to experimental data. From the calculations, one finds that (i) predictions made by different methodologies differ significantly and (ii) optB86b-vdW functional and Grimme dispersion correction seem to provide the best balanced description of stability of physisorption and chemisorption states, the attachment strength of the latter on Ni(111) surface, the graphene-Ni(111) separation, and the bandstructure of chemisorbed graphene. The collation suggests that accurate and affordable theoretical studies on technologies based on graphene-metal contacts are already at hand. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available