4.7 Article

Derivation of a true (t → 0+) quantum transition-state theory. II. Recovery of the exact quantum rate in the absence of recrossing

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 139, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4819076

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G055629/1, EP/I002499/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/G055629/1, EP/I002499/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Paper I [T. J. H. Hele and S. C. Althorpe, J. Chem. Phys. 138, 084108 (2013)] we derived a quantum transition-state theory (TST) by taking the t -> 0(+) limit of a new form of quantum flux-side time-correlation function containing a ring-polymer dividing surface. This t -> 0(+) limit appears to be unique in giving positive-definite Boltzmann statistics, and is identical to ring-polymer molecular dynamics (RPMD) TST. Here, we show that quantum TST (i.e., RPMD-TST) is exact if there is no recrossing (by the real-time quantum dynamics) of the ring-polymer dividing surface, nor of any surface orthogonal to it in the space describing fluctuations in the polymer-bead positions along the reaction coordinate. In practice, this means that RPMD-TST gives a good approximation to the exact quantum rate for direct reactions, provided the temperature is not too far below the cross-over to deep tunnelling. We derive these results by comparing the t -> infinity limit of the ring-polymer flux-side time-correlation function with that of a hybrid flux-side time-correlation function (containing a ring-polymer flux operator and a Miller-Schwarz-Tromp side function), and by representing the resulting ring-polymer momentum integrals as hypercubes. Together with Paper I, the results of this article validate a large number of RPMD calculations of reaction rates. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available