4.7 Article

The nature of singlet excitons in oligoacene molecular crystals

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 134, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3590871

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-0906464, DMR-0120967]
  2. Office of Naval Research (ONR)
  3. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUSC1-015-21]
  4. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office [PAI 6/27]
  5. Programme d'Excellence de la Region Wallonne
  6. FNRS-FRFC
  7. U.S. Department of Energy
  8. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Science [DE-SC0001088]
  9. Division Of Materials Research
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0906464] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A theory for polarized absorption in crystalline oligoacenes is presented, which includes Frenkel exciton coupling, the coupling between Frenkel and charge-transfer (CT) excitons, and the coupling of all neutral and ionic excited states to the dominant ring-breathing vibrational mode. For tetracene, spectra calculated using all Frenkel couplings among the five lowest energy molecular singlet states predict a Davydov splitting (DS) of the lowest energy (0-0) vibronic band of only -32 cm(-1), far smaller than the measured value of 631 cm(-1) and of the wrong sign-a negative sign indicating that the polarizations of the lower and upper Davydov components are reversed from experiment. Inclusion of Frenkel-CT coupling dramatically improves the agreement with experiment, yielding a 0-0 DS of 601 cm(-1) and a nearly quantitative reproduction of the relative spectral intensities of the 0-n vibronic components. Our analysis also shows that CT mixing increases with the size of the oligoacenes. We discuss the implications of these results on exciton dissociation and transport. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3590871]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available