4.7 Article

Development and application of the analytical energy gradient for the normalized elimination of the small component method

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 134, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3603454

Keywords

coupled cluster calculations; density functional theory; gradient methods; HF calculations; molecular configurations; quantum theory; wave functions

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE 071893]
  2. Division Of Chemistry
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0965635] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The analytical energy gradient of the normalized elimination of the small component (NESC) method is derived for the first time and implemented for the routine calculation of NESC geometries and other first order molecular properties. Essential for the derivation is the correct calculation of the transformation matrix U relating the small component to the pseudolarge component of the wavefunction. The exact form of partial derivative U/partial derivative lambda is derived and its contribution to the analytical energy gradient is investigated. The influence of a finite nucleus model and that of the picture change is determined. Different ways of speeding up the calculation of the NESC gradient are tested. It is shown that first order properties can routinely be calculated in combination with Hartree-Fock, density functional theory (DFT), coupled cluster theory, or any electron correlation corrected quantum chemical method, provided the NESC Hamiltonian is determined in an efficient, but nevertheless accurate way. The general applicability of the analytical NESC gradient is demonstrated by benchmark calculations for NESC/CCSD (coupled cluster with all single and double excitation) and NESC/DFT involving up to 800 basis functions. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3603454]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available