4.7 Article

Analytical approach for the excited-state Hessian in time-dependent density functional theory: Formalism, implementation, and performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 135, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3659312

Keywords

approximation theory; density functional theory; excited states; ground states; Hessian matrices; oscillator strengths; vibrational states

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [20833003, 21073168]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB808501]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper presents the formalism, implementation, and performance of the analytical approach for the excited-state Hessian in the time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) that extends our previous work [J. Liu and W. Z. Liang, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 014113 (2011)] on the analytical Hessian in TDDFT within Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA) to full TDDFT. In contrast to TDA-TDDFT, an appreciable advantage of full TDDFT is that it maintains the oscillator strength sum rule, and therefore yields more precise results for the oscillator strength and other related physical quantities. For the excited-state harmonic vibrational frequency calculation, however, full TDDFT does not seem to be advantageous since the numerical tests demonstrate that the accuracy of TDDFT with and without TDA are comparable to each other. As a common practice, the computed harmonic vibrational frequencies are scaled by a suitable scale factor to yield good agreement with the experimental fundamental frequencies. Here we apply both the optimized ground-state and excited-state scale factors to scale the calculated excited-state harmonic frequencies and find that the scaling decreases the root-mean-square errors. The optimized scale factors derived from the excited-state calculations are slightly smaller than those from the ground-state calculations. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3659312]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available