4.7 Article

How accurate are the nonlinear chemical Fokker-Planck and chemical Langevin equations?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 135, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3625958

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SULSA (Scottish Universities Life Science Alliance)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical Fokker-Planck equation and the corresponding chemical Langevin equation are commonly used approximations of the chemical master equation. These equations are derived from an uncontrolled, second-order truncation of the Kramers-Moyal expansion of the chemical master equation and hence their accuracy remains to be clarified. We use the system-size expansion to show that chemical Fokker-Planck estimates of the mean concentrations and of the variance of the concentration fluctuations about the mean are accurate to order Omega(-3/2) for reaction systems which do not obey detailed balance and at least accurate to order Omega(-2) for systems obeying detailed balance, where Omega is the characteristic size of the system. Hence, the chemical Fokker-Planck equation turns out to be more accurate than the linear-noise approximation of the chemical master equation (the linear Fokker-Planck equation) which leads to mean concentration estimates accurate to order Omega(-1/2) and variance estimates accurate to order Omega(-3/2). This higher accuracy is particularly conspicuous for chemical systems realized in small volumes such as biochemical reactions inside cells. A formula is also obtained for the approximate size of the relative errors in the concentration and variance predictions of the chemical Fokker-Planck equation, where the relative error is defined as the difference between the predictions of the chemical Fokker-Planck equation and the master equation divided by the prediction of the master equation. For dimerization and enzyme-catalyzed reactions, the errors are typically less than few percent even when the steady-state is characterized by merely few tens of molecules. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3625958]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available