4.7 Article

DFT plus U calculations of crystal lattice, electronic structure, and phase stability under pressure of TiO2 polymorphs

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.3617244

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science [MAT2007-62929, CSD2007-00045, CTQ2009-14596-C02-01]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid [S2009-PPQ/1551]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work investigates crystal lattice, electronic structure, relative stability, and high pressure behavior of TiO2 polymorphs (anatase, rutile, and columbite) using the density functional theory (DFT) improved by an on-site Coulomb self-interaction potential (DFT+U). For the latter the effect of the U parameter value (0 < U < 10 eV) is analyzed within the local density approximation (LDA+U) and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA+U). Results are compared to those of conventional DFT and Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzehorf screened hybrid functional (HSE06). For the investigation of the individual polymorphs (crystal and electronic structures), the GGA+U/LDA+U method and the HSE06 functional are in better agreement with experiments compared to the conventional GGA or LDA. Within the DFT+U the reproduction of the experimental band-gap of rutile/anatase is achieved with a U value of 10/8 eV, whereas a better description of the crystal and electronic structures is obtained for U < 5 eV. Conventional GGA/LDA and HSE06 fail to reproduce phase stability at ambient pressure, rendering the anatase form lower in energy than the rutile phase. The LDA+U excessively stabilizes the columbite form. The GGA+U method corrects these deficiencies; U values between 5 and 8 eV are required to get an energetic sequence consistent with experiments (E-rutile < E-anatase < E-columbite). The computed phase stability under pressure within the GGA+U is also consistent with experimental results. The best agreement between experimental and computed transition pressures is reached for U approximate to 5 eV. (c) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3617244]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available