4.7 Article

Mutual diffusion coefficients of heptane isomers in nitrogen: A molecular dynamics study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3512918

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [F022058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accurate knowledge of transport properties of pure and mixture fluids is essential for the design of various chemical and mechanical systems that include fluxes of mass, momentum, and energy. In this study we determine the mutual diffusion coefficients of mixtures composed of heptane isomers and nitrogen using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with fully atomistic intermolecular potential parameters, in conjunction with the Green-Kubo formula. The computed results were compared with the values obtained using the Chapman-Enskog (C-E) equation with Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential parameters derived from the correlations of state values: MD simulations predict a maximum difference of 6% among isomers while the C-E equation presents that of 3% in the mutual diffusion coefficients in the temperature range 500-1000 K. The comparison of two approaches implies that the corresponding state principle can be applied to the models, which are only weakly affected by the anisotropy of the interaction potentials and the large uncertainty will be included in its application for complex polyatomic molecules. The MD simulations successfully address the pure effects of molecular structure among isomers on mutual diffusion coefficients by revealing that the differences of the total mutual diffusion coefficients for the six mixtures are caused mainly by heptane isomers. The cross interaction potential parameters, collision diameter s12, and potential energy well depth e12 of heptane isomers and nitrogen mixtures were also computed from the mutual diffusion coefficients. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3512918]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available