4.7 Article

Critical comparison of electrode models in density functional theory based quantum transport calculations

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3526044

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish MICINN [FIS2010-21883-C02-02]
  2. CONSOLIDER [CSD2007-00010]
  3. ETSF [INFRA-2007-211956]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the performance of two different electrode models in quantum transport calculations based on density functional theory: parametrized Bethe lattices and quasi-one-dimensional wires or nanowires. A detailed account of implementation details in both the cases is given. From the systematic study of nanocontacts made of representative metallic elements, we can conclude that the parametrized electrode models represent an excellent compromise between computational cost and electronic structure definition as long as the aim is to compare with experiments where the precise atomic structure of the electrodes is not relevant or defined with precision. The results obtained using parametrized Bethe lattices are essentially similar to the ones obtained with quasi-one-dimensional electrodes for large enough cross-sections of these, adding a natural smearing to the transmission curves that mimics the true nature of polycrystalline electrodes. The latter are more demanding from the computational point of view, but present the advantage of expanding the range of applicability of transport calculations to situations where the electrodes have a well-defined atomic structure, as is the case for carbon nanotubes, graphene nanoribbons, or semiconducting nanowires. All the analysis is done with the help of codes developed by the authors which can be found in the quantum transport toolbox ALACANT and are publicly available. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3526044]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available