4.7 Article

A tractable and accurate electronic structure method for static correlations: The perfect hextuples model

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 133, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3456001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Energy Research, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences Division of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC0376SF00098]
  2. SciDac Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the next stage in a hierarchy of local approximations to complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) model in an active space of one active orbital per active electron based on the valence orbital-optimized coupled-cluster (VOO-CC) formalism. Following the perfect pairing (PP) model, which is exact for a single electron pair and extensive, and the perfect quadruples (PQ) model, which is exact for two pairs, we introduce the perfect hextuples (PH) model, which is exact for three pairs. PH is an approximation to the VOO-CC method truncated at hextuples containing all correlations between three electron pairs. While VOO-CCDTQ56 requires computational effort scaling with the 14th power of molecular size, PH requires only sixth power effort. Our implementation also introduces some techniques which reduce the scaling to fifth order and has been applied to active spaces roughly twice the size of the CASSCF limit without any symmetry. Because PH explicitly correlates up to six electrons at a time, it can faithfully model the static correlations of molecules with up to triple bonds in a size-consistent fashion and for organic reactions usually reproduces CASSCF with chemical accuracy. The convergence of the PP, PQ, and PH hierarchy is demonstrated on a variety of examples including symmetry breaking in benzene, the Cope rearrangement, the Bergman reaction, and the dissociation of fluorine. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3456001]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available