4.7 Article

Photodissociation and photoionization of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid at 193 and 355 nm

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 133, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3518709

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photodissociation and photoionization of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (25DHBA), at 193 and 355 nm were investigated separately in a molecular beam using multimass ion imaging techniques. Two channels competed after excitation by one 193 nm photon. One channel is dissociation from the repulsive excited state along O-H bond distance, resulting in H atom elimination from meta-OH functional group. The other channel is internal conversion to the ground state, followed by H2O elimination. Some of the fragments further proceeded to secondary dissociation. On the other hand, absorption of one 355 nm photon gave rise to H2O elimination channel on the ground state. Absorption of more than one 355 nm photon resulted in the three-body dissociation which also occurs on the ground state. Dissociation on the excited state does not play a role at 355 nm. The large concentration ratio (2x10(5)), between neutral fragments and cations produced from 355 nm multiphoton excitation indicates that internal conversion followed by dissociation, is the major channel for 355 nm multiphoton excitation. Multiphoton ionization is a minor channel. Multiphoton ionization of 25DHBA clusters only produces 25DHBA cations. Neither anion nor protonated 25DHBA cation were observed. It is very different from the ions produced from solid matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI), experiments. This suggests that protonated 25DHBA and negatively charged 25DHBA generated in MALDI experiments does not simply result from the ionization following proton transfer reactions or charge transfer reactions of the clusters in the gas phase. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3518709]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available