4.7 Article

Ab initio investigation of benzene clusters: Molecular tailoring approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 133, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3494536

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DAE-BRNS, Mumbai
  2. University Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi
  3. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi
  4. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An exhaustive study on the clusters of benzene (Bz)(n), n=2-8, at MP2/6-31++G** level of theory is reported. The relative strengths of CH-pi and pi-pi interactions in these aggregates are examined, which eventually govern the pattern of cluster formation. A linear scaling method, viz., molecular tailoring approach (MTA), is efficiently employed for studying the energetics and growth patterns of benzene clusters consisting up to eight benzene (Bz) units. Accuracy of MTA-based calculations is appraised by performing the corresponding standard calculations wherever possible, i.e., up to tetramers. For benzene tetramers, the error introduced in energy is of the order of 0.1 mH (similar to 0.06 kcal/mol). Although for higher clusters the error may build up, further corrections based on many-body interaction energy analysis substantially reduce the error in the MTA-estimate. This is demonstrated for a prototypical case of benzene hexamer. A systematic way of building up a cluster of n monomers (n-mer) which employs molecular electrostatic potential of an (n-1)-mer is illustrated. The trends obtained using MTA method are essentially identical to those of the standard methods in terms of structure and energy. In summary, this study clearly brings out the possibility of effecting such large calculations, which are not possible conventionally, by the use of MTA without a significant loss of accuracy. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3494536]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available