4.7 Article

Redox potentials and pKa for benzoquinone from density functional theory based molecular dynamics

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 131, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3250438

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/F005636/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F005636/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The density functional theory based molecular dynamics (DFTMD) method for the computation of redox free energies presented in previous publications and the more recent modification for computation of acidity constants are reviewed. The method uses a half reaction scheme based on reversible insertion/removal of electrons and protons. The proton insertion is assisted by restraining potentials acting as chaperones. The procedure for relating the calculated deprotonation free energies to Bronsted acidities (pK(a)) and the oxidation free energies to electrode potentials with respect to the normal hydrogen electrode is discussed in some detail. The method is validated in an application to the reduction of aqueous 1,4-benzoquinone. The conversion of hydroquinone to quinone can take place via a number of alternative pathways consisting of combinations of acid dissociations, oxidations, or dehydrogenations. The free energy changes of all elementary steps (ten in total) are computed. The accuracy of the calculations is assessed by comparing the energies of different pathways for the same reaction (Hess's law) and by comparison to experiment. This two-sided test enables us to separate the errors related with the restrictions on length and time scales accessible to DFTMD from the errors introduced by the DFT approximation. It is found that the DFT approximation is the main source of error for oxidation free energies. (c) 2009 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3250438]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available