4.7 Review

Density functional method including weak interactions: Dispersion coefficients based on the local response approximation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 131, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3269802

Keywords

binding energy; density functional theory; geometry; ground states; polarisability; weak interactions (molecular physics)

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [KAKENHI 18066016, WAKATE-B-21750025]
  2. Research Institute for Science and Engineering (RISE)
  3. Waseda University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new method to calculate the atom-atom dispersion coefficients in a molecule is proposed for the use in density functional theory with dispersion (DFT-D) correction. The method is based on the local response approximation due to Dobson and Dinte [Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1780 (1996)], with modified dielectric model recently proposed by Vydrov and van Voorhis [J. Chem. Phys. 130, 104105 (2009)]. The local response model is used to calculate the distributed multipole polarizabilities of atoms in a molecule, from which the dispersion coefficients are obtained by an explicit frequency integral of the Casimir-Polder type. Thus obtained atomic polarizabilities are also used in the damping function for the short-range singularity. Unlike empirical DFT-D methods, the local response dispersion (LRD) method is able to calculate the dispersion energy from the ground-state electron density only. It is applicable to any geometry, free from physical constants such as van der Waals radii or atomic polarizabilities, and computationally very efficient. The LRD method combined with the long-range corrected DFT functional (LC-BOP) is applied to calculations of S22 weakly bound complex set [Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 1985 (2006)]. Binding energies obtained by the LC-BOP+LRD agree remarkably well with ab initio references.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available