4.7 Article

Determination of the solid-liquid interfacial free energy along a coexistence line by Gibbs-Cahn integration

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 131, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3231693

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-06ER46282]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. Shanghai Project for the Basic Research [08JC1408400]
  4. U. S. Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We calculate the solid-liquid interfacial free energy gamma(sl) for the Lennard-Jones (LJ) system at several points along the pressure-temperature coexistence curve using molecular-dynamics simulation and Gibbs-Cahn integration. This method uses the excess interfacial energy (e) and stress (tau) along the coexistence curve to determine a differential equation for gamma(sl) as a function of temperature. Given the values of gamma(sl) for the (100), (110), and (111) LJ interfaces at the triple-point temperature (Gamma* =kT/epsilon=0.618), previously obtained using the cleaving method by Davidchack and Laird [J. Chem. Phys. 118, 7657 (2003)], this differential equation can be integrated to obtain gamma(sl) for these interfaces at higher coexistence temperatures. Our values for gamma(sl) calculated in this way at Gamma*=1.0 and 1.5 are in good agreement with those determined previously by cleaving, but were obtained with significantly less computational effort than required by either the cleaving method or the capillary fluctuation method of Hoyt, Asta, and Karma [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5530 (2001)]. In addition, the orientational anisotropy in the excess interface energy, stress and entropy, calculated using the conventional Gibbs dividing surface, are seen to be significantly larger than the relatively small anisotropies in gamma(sl) itself. (C) 2009 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3231693]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available