4.7 Article

Charge constrained density functional molecular dynamics for simulation of condensed phase electron transfer reactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3190169

Keywords

charge exchange; chemical exchanges; density functional theory; energy gap; free energy; molecular dynamics method; reaction kinetics theory; ruthenium compounds; solvation

Funding

  1. EPSRC
  2. Royal Society for a University Research Fellowship
  3. EPSRC [EP/F004699/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F004699/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a plane-wave basis set implementation of charge constrained density functional molecular dynamics (CDFT-MD) for simulation of electron transfer reactions in condensed phase systems. Following the earlier work of Wu and Van Voorhis [Phys. Rev. A 72, 024502 (2005)], the density functional is minimized under the constraint that the charge difference between donor and acceptor is equal to a given value. The classical ion dynamics is propagated on the Born-Oppenheimer surface of the charge constrained state. We investigate the dependence of the constrained energy and of the energy gap on the definition of the charge and present expressions for the constraint forces. The method is applied to the Ru2+-Ru3+ electron self-exchange reaction in aqueous solution. Sampling the vertical energy gap along CDFT-MD trajectories and correcting for finite size effects, a reorganization free energy of 1.6 eV is obtained. This is 0.1-0.2 eV lower than a previous estimate based on a continuum model for solvation. The smaller value for the reorganization free energy can be explained by the fact that the Ru-O distances of the divalent and trivalent Ru hexahydrates are predicted to be more similar in the electron transfer complex than for the separated aqua ions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available