4.7 Article

Characterization of nanofibers formed by self-assembly of β-peptide oligomers using small angle x-ray scattering

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 129, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2955745

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UW-Madison Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center (NSF) [DMR-0425880]
  2. Robert A. Welch Foundation [C1557]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Helical oligomers of beta-peptides represent a particularly promising type of building block for directed assembly of organic nanostructures because the helical secondary structure can be designed to be very stable and because control of the beta-amino acid sequence can lead to precise patterning of chemical functional groups over the helix surfaces. In this paper, we report the use of small angle x-ray scattering measurements (SAXS) to characterize nanostructures formed by the directed assembly of beta-peptide A with sequence H2N-beta(3)hTyr-beta(3)hLys-beta(3)hPhe-ACHC-beta(3)hPhe-ACHC-beta(3)hPhe-beta(3)hLys-ACHC-ACHC-beta(3)hPhe-beta(3)hLys-CONH2. Whereas prior cryo-TEM studies have revealed the presence of nanofibers in aqueous solutions of beta-peptide A, SAXS measurements from the nanofibers were not well-fit by a form factor model describing solid nanofibers. An improved fit to the scattering data at high q was obtained by using a form factor model describing a cylinder with a hollow center and radial polydispersity. When combined with a structure factor calculated from the polymer reference interaction site model (PRISM) theory, the scattered intensity of x-rays measured over the entire q range was well described by the model. Analysis of our SAXS data suggests a model in which individual beta-peptides assemble to form long cylindrical nanofibers with a hollow core radius of 15 A (polydispersity of 21%) and a shell thickness of 20 A. This model is supported by negative stain transmission electron microscopy. (C) 2008 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available