4.7 Article

Energetics and kinetics of Ti clustering on neutral and charged C60 surfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 129, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2981043

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. DOE [DEFG0205ER46209, DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. U.S. NSF [DMR-0606485]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using ab initio spin density functional theory, we investigate the energetics and kinetics of Ti clustering on both neutral and charged C-60 surfaces. We compare the formation energy of sparsely dispersed zero-dimensional (0D), compact single-layered two-dimensional (2D), and clustered three-dimensional (3D) Ti-N configurations as a function of cluster size (N <= 12) and further study the transformation kinetics between them. We find that 0D configuration is always less stable than that of 2D and 3D configurations and 0D to 2D transformation involves in a single Ti diffusion process with kinetic barrier of <= 0.7 eV. On the other hand, there exists a critical cluster size (N-C) of N-C=5, below which 2D layers are preferred to 3D clusters. Hole- or B-doping greatly enhance the Ti-fullerene interaction and lead to stronger dispersion of Ti atoms. Even so, for moderate charge doping (less than seven holes) the critical size of Ti atoms on neutral C-60 surprisingly remains unchanged or only slightly increases to N-C=6 by B-doping. However, we find that the formation of 3D clusters may be hindered by a high kinetic barrier related to the process of single Ti atoms climbing up a single Ti layer. This barrier is similar to 1 eV or even 1.47 eV for B-doped C-60 surfaces which is high enough to stabilize larger 2D structures (N >= N-C) at low temperatures. These findings may prove to be instrumental in stabilizing transition metal coated nanostructures and especially homogeneously Ti-coated fullerenes, which are believed to be a very promising material for hydrogen storage. (C) 2008 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available