4.7 Article

Thalamus structure and function determine severity of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 8, Pages 776-783

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001285

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dutch MS Research Foundation [02-358b, 05-358c, 08-648, 08-650, 09-358d]
  2. neuroscience campus Amsterdam

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective:This study investigates whether changes in functional connectivity, diffusivity, and volume of the thalamus can explain different severities of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS).Methods:An inception cohort of 157 patients with MS (104 women, mean age 41 years), 6 years postdiagnosis, was divided into 3 groups: cognitively preserved (CP, n = 108), mildly cognitively impaired (MCI, n = 22), and more severely cognitively impaired (SCI, n = 27). These groups were matched to 47 healthy controls (HC, 28 women, mean age 41 years). Thalamic volume, thalamic skeleton diffusivity (fractional anisotropy [FA] and mean diffusivity [MD]), and thalamic resting-state functional connectivity (FC) were compared between groups.Results:Thalamic volume was significantly lower in all patient groups compared to controls, with lowest volumes in patients with SCI, and no difference between CP and MCI. Thalamic skeleton FA was decreased in SCI compared to HC only; MD was increased in SCI compared to all other groups. Thalamic FC was increased in SCI with a total of 15 regions, mainly sensorimotor, frontal, and occipital parts of the brain. Thalamic volume, FC, and MD remained independent predictors in a linear regression model (R-2 = 0.46), together with male sex and a lower level of education. Lesion and whole-brain volumes were not significant predictors.Conclusions:These findings indicate that thalamic changes in structure and function are highly informative regarding overall cognitive performance in MS. Increased thalamic FC only became apparent in SCI, possibly as a sign of maladaption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available