4.7 Article

Cognitive functioning of patients with a PRL-secreting pituitary adenoma A preliminary report

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 8, Pages 731-734

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002252

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Poland [BST 171203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate cognitive functions in patients with prolactin (PRL)-secreting pituitary adenoma. Methods: We conducted a hospital-based case-control study. The effect of PRL overproduction on cognitive processes was assessed with a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests to measure verbal memory, nonverbal memory, attention, visuospatial skills, verbal fluency, and executive functions. The data were gathered from 40 participants matched for age, sex, handedness, and education (20 with pituitary adenoma, 20 healthy controls). The patients were examined on the first day of their hospitalization in the Department of Neurosurgery of Medical University of Warsaw. MRI as well as blood test of pituitary hormone level and perimetry test of the visual field were conducted. Results: The group of patients had significantly lower scores on verbal memory, nonverbal memory, and attention tests compared with healthy volunteers. Their results in memory and visuospatial tests were significantly negatively correlated with the level of PRL but there was no marked relationship between cognitive functioning and the size of tumor. Conclusions: This study demonstrated a significant relationship between PRL overproduction and worsening of cognitive processes, especially in the domains of memory and attention in hospitalized patients with pituitary adenomas. Greater hyperprolactinemia was associated with a larger decrease in cognitive performance. There was no effect of tumor size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available