4.7 Article

Development of excessive daytime sleepiness in early Parkinson disease

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages 162-168

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001737

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Western Norway Health Authority [911218, 911792]
  2. Research Council of Norway [177966]
  3. Norwegian Parkinson Disease Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the frequency, development, and risk factors of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in a cohort of originally drug-naive patients with incident Parkinson disease (PD) during the first 5 years after diagnosis. Methods: One hundred fifty-three drug-naive patients with early PD derived from a population-based incident cohort and 169 control participants were assessed for EDS and reevaluated after 1, 3, and 5 years on medication. EDS was diagnosed according to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Cutoff score above 10 was applied. Generalized estimating equation models for correlated data were used to examine associated and risk factors for EDS. Results: Patients reported EDS more often than control participants at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up. The frequency of EDS in PD increased from 11.8% at baseline to 23.4% after 5 years. Associated factors were male sex, the use of dopamine agonists, and higher Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-activities of daily living scores. Main risk factor for developing EDS was an increased Epworth Sleepiness Scale score at baseline. Conclusion: EDS is more frequent in PD even before treatment initiation compared with control participants and increases in occurrence with disease progression. The main risk factor for developing EDS with time is an early predisposition for sleepiness. In addition, the use of dopamine agonists was associated with the development of EDS. These findings necessitate caution in patients with PD and early increased sleep propensity and when using dopamine agonists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available