4.2 Article

Viscosity and Density of Aqueous Solutions of Carbon Dioxide at Temperatures from (274 to 449) K and at Pressures up to 100 MPa

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages 171-180

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/je5009125

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. QCCSRC
  2. Qatar Petroleum
  3. Shell
  4. Qatar Science & Technology Park

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The viscosity and density of aqueous solutions of carbon dioxide having mole fractions of CO2 of 0.0086, 0.0168, and 0.0271 are reported. The measurements were made in the single-phase compressed liquid region at temperatures between (294 and 449) K at pressures up to 100 MPa; additional density measurements were also made at T = 274 K in the same pressure range. The viscosity was measured with a vibrating-wire viscometer while the density was measured by means of a vibrating U-tube densimeter; both were calibrated with pure water and either vacuum or ambient air. The density data have an expanded relative uncertainty of 0.07 % with a coverage factor of 2. From the raw data, the partial molar volume of CO2 in aqueous solution has been determined and correlated as an empirical function of temperature and pressure. When combined with the IAPWS-95 equation of state of pure water, this correlation represents the measured densities of under-saturated solutions of CO2 in water within +/- 0.04 %. The viscosity data have an expanded relative uncertainty of 1.4 % with a coverage factor of 2. A modified Vogel-Fulcher-Tamman equation was used to correlate the viscosity as a function of temperature, pressure, and mole fraction of CO2 with an absolute average relative deviation of 0.4 %. The viscosity and density of saturated aqueous solutions of CO2 may be calculated by combining the correlations presented in this work with a suitable model for the mole fraction of CO2 at saturation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available