4.2 Article

Adsorption of Cationic Dyes on a Cellulose-Based Multicarboxyl Adsorbent

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 413-421

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/je301140c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Key Scientific and Technological Project of Henan province [112102310360, 122300410260]
  2. natural science research project of Henan province education department [2011A610005]
  3. foundation of International Scientific and Technological Cooperation of the Henan province in China [124300510012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel adsorbent based on cellulose (CGD) was prepared via modifying with glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and differential thermogravimetry (DTA/TGA). Malachite green (MG) and basic fuchsine (BF) were used to resemble cationic dyes in wastewaters. The influences of several parameters (contact time, pH, temperature, initial concentration) were evaluated to determine the best adsorption conditions. Langmuir adsorption isotherm items explained MG adsorption well, while BF was fitted well with the Freundlich model. The maximum adsorption capacities were greater than some other reports, 1155.76 mg.g(-1) for a BF internal concentration of 2000 mg.L-1 and 458.72 mg.g(-1) for MG in theory. Kinetics and thermodynamics were adopted to explain in-depth information associated with the adsorption process. The adsorption processes of dyes were both feasible spontaneous and well-described by the pseudosecond-order model. The dynamic adsorption/desorption experiments, with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution as the eluent, show that the adsorbent could be reused for five cycles or four cycles, keeping the adsorption rate above 85 % and 90 % for BF and MG, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available