4.6 Article

Endothelial progenitor cells augment collateralization and hemodynamic rescue in a model of chronic cerebral ischemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 34, Issue 8, Pages 1297-1305

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.78

Keywords

arteriogenesis; cerebral blood flow; cerebrovascular disease; collateral circulation; endothelial progenitor cells

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-WO) [1704/11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surgical flow augmentation for treatment of cerebral hemodynamic impairment remains controversial. Here, we investigated the benefit of endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) treatment in a rat model of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. At repeated time points after 3-vessel occlusion (3-VO), animals were treated with 1 x 10(6) Dil-labeled (a) ex vivo-expanded embryonic-EPC (e-EPC), (b) cyclic AMP-differentiated embryonic-endothelial progenitor-derived cells (e-EPDC as biologic control) or, (c) saline. The cerebrovascular reserve capacity (CVRC) was assessed immediately before and on days 7 and 21 after 3-VO. Structural effects were assessed by latex perfusion, immunohistochemistry, and intravital fluorescence video microscopy on day 21. Three-vessel occlusion resulted in a significant impairment of the CVRC with better functional recovery after treatment with e-EPC (16.4 +/- 8%) compared with e-EPDC (3.7 +/- 8%) or saline (6.4 +/- 9%) by day 21 (P<0.05), which was paralleled by a significant increase in the vessel diameters of the anterior Circle of Willis, a significantly higher number of leptomeningeal anastomoses and higher parenchymal capillary density in e-EPC-treated animals. Interestingly, despite in vivo interaction of e-EPC with the cerebral endothelium, e-EPC incorporation into the cerebral vasculature was not observed. Our results suggest that EPC may serve as a novel therapeutic agent in clinical trials for nonsurgical treatment of chronic cerebral hemodynamic impairment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available