4.6 Article

Water deprivation induces neurovascular and cognitive dysfunction through vasopressin-induced oxidative stress

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 852-860

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.24

Keywords

cerebrovascular dysfunction; dehydration; endothelin-1; vasopressin

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL096571, HL096571] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS73666, R01 NS073666, R01 NS037853] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adequate hydration is essential for normal brain function and dehydration induces cognitive deterioration. In addition, dehydration has emerged as a stroke risk factor. However, it is unknown whether alterations in cerebrovascular regulation are responsible for these effects. To address this issue, C57BI/6 mice were water deprived for 24 or 48 hours and somatosensory cortex blood flow was assessed by laser-Doppler flowmetry in a cranial window. Dehydration increased plasma osmolality and vasopressin levels, and suppressed the increase in blood flow induced by neural activity, by the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine and the smooth muscle relaxant adenosine. The cerebrovascular dysfunction was associated with oxidative stress and cognitive deficits, assessed using the Y maze. The vasopressin la receptor antagonist SR49059 improved the dehydration-induced oxidative stress and vasomotor dysfunction. Dehydration upregulated endothelin-1 in cerebral blood vessels, an effect blocked by SR49059. Furthermore, the endothelin A receptor antagonist BQ123 ameliorated cerebrovascular function. These findings show for the first time that dehydration alters critical mechanisms regulating the cerebral circulation through vasopressin and oxidative stress. The ensuing cerebrovascular dysregulation may alter cognitive function and increase the brain's susceptibility to cerebral ischemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available