4.6 Article

Blood-spinal cord barrier pericyte reductions contribute to increased capillary permeability

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 1841-1852

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.113

Keywords

blood-brain barrier; capillaries; endothelium; pericytes; vascular biology

Funding

  1. ALS Association [1859]
  2. NIH [AG039452]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The blood spinal cord barrier (BSCB) regulates molecular exchange between blood and spinal cord. Pericytes are presumed to be important cellular constituents of the BSCB. However, the regional abundance and vascular functions of spinal cord pericytes have yet to be determined. Utilizing wildtype mice, we show that spinal cord pericyte capillary coverage and number compared with the brain regions are reduced most prominently in the anterior horn. Regional pericyte variations are highly correlated with: (1) increased capillary permeability to 350 Da, 40,0000a, and 150,000 Da, but not 2,000,000 Da fluorescent vascular tracers in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions and (2) diminished endothelial zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and occludin tight junction protein expression. Pericyte-deficient mutations (Pdgfr beta(F7/F7) mice) resulted in additional pericyte reductions in spinal cord capillaries leading to overt BSCB disruption to serum proteins, accumulation in motor neurons of cyotoxic thrombin and fibrin and motor neuron loss. Barrier disruption in perciyte-deficient mice coincided with further reductions in ZO-1 and occludin. These data suggest that pericytes contribute to proper function of the BSCB at the capillary level. Regional reductions in spinal cord pericytes may provide a cellular basis for heightened spinal cord barrier capillary permeability and motor neuron loss. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2012) 32, 1841-1852; doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.113; published online 1 August 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available