4.6 Article

Early loss of pericytes and perivascular stromal cell-induced scar formation after stroke

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 428-439

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.187

Keywords

cerebral ischemia; extracellular matrix; fibrosis; neurovascular unit; pericyte; platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FOR1336/B3, TRR43/A7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite its limited regenerative capacity, the central nervous system (CNS) shares more repair mechanisms with peripheral tissues than previously recognized. Scar formation is a ubiquitous healing mechanism aimed at patching tissue defects via the generation of fibrous extracellular matrix (ECM). This process, orchestrated by stromal cells, can unfavorably affect the capacity of tissues to restore function. Vascular mural cells have been found to contribute to scarring after spinal cord injury. In the case of stroke, little is known about the responses of pericytes (PCs) and stromal cells. Here, we show that capillary PCs are rapidly lost after cerebral ischemia in both experimental and human stroke. Coincident with this loss is a massive proliferation of resident platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFR beta)(+) and CD105(+) stromal cells, which originate from the neurovascular unit and deposit ECM in the ischemic mouse brain. The presence of PDGFR beta(+) stromal cells demarcates a fibrotic, contracted, and macrophage-laden lesion core from the rim of hypertrophic astroglia in both experimental and human stroke. We suggest that a previously unrecognized population of CNS-resident stromal cells drives a dynamic process of scarring after cerebral ischemia, which appears distinct from the glial scar and represents a novel target for regenerative stroke therapies. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2013) 33, 428-439; doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.187; published online 19 December 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available