4.6 Article

Rapid magnetic resonance measurement of global cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption in humans during rest and hypercapnia

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 31, Issue 7, Pages 1504-1512

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.34

Keywords

carotid artery; cerebral blood flow measurement; cerebral hemodynamics; energy metabolism; MRI

Funding

  1. National Center For Research Resources [UL1RR024134]
  2. [NIH R01-MH080892]
  3. [NIH R21-HL088182]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of hypercapnia on cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption (CMRO2) has been a subject of intensive investigation and debate. Most applications of hypercapnia are based on the assumption that a mild increase in partial pressure of carbon dioxide has negligible effect on cerebral metabolism. In this study, we sought to further investigate the vascular and metabolic effects of hypercapnia by simultaneously measuring global venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) and total cerebral blood flow (tCBF), with a temporal resolution of 30 seconds using magnetic resonance susceptometry and phase-contrast techniques in 10 healthy awake adults. While significant increases in SvO2 and tCBF were observed during hypercapnia (P < 0.005), no change in CMRO2 was noted (P > 0.05). Additionally, fractional changes in tCBF and end-tidal carbon dioxide (R-2 = 0.72, P < 0.005), as well as baseline SvO2 and tCBF (R-2 = 0.72, P < 0.005), were found to be correlated. The data also suggested a correlation between cerebral vascular reactivity (CVR) and baseline tCBF (R-2 = 0.44, P = 0.052). A CVR value of 6.1% +/- 1.6%/mmHg was determined using a linear-fit model. Additionally, an average undershoot of 6.7% +/- 4% and 17.1% +/- 7% was observed in SvO2 and tCBF upon recovery from hypercapnia in six subjects. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2011) 31, 1504-1512; doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.34; published online 20 April 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available