4.6 Article

Long-lasting protection in brain trauma by endotoxin preconditioning

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages 1919-1929

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.42

Keywords

inflammation; neuroprotection; pathophysiology; preconditioning; traumatic brain injury

Funding

  1. Fondazione Cariplo [2006.0864]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the occurrence of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) preconditioning in traumatic brain injury (TBI), evaluating the time window of LPS-induced protection, its persistence, and the associated molecular mechanisms. Mice received 0.1 mg/kg LPS or saline intraperitoneally and subsequently TBI (by controlled cortical impact brain injury) at various time intervals. Mice receiving LPS 3, 5, or 7 days before TBI showed attenuated motor deficits at 1 week after injury compared with mice receiving saline. Those receiving LPS 5 days before injury had also a reduced contusion volume (7.9 +/- 1.3 versus 12 +/- 2.3 mm(3)) and decreased cell death. One month after injury, the protective effect of LPS on contusion volume (14.5 +/- 1.2 versus 18.2 +/- 1.2 mm(3)) and neurologic function was still present. Traumatic brain injury increased glial fibrillary acidic protein, CD11b, CD68, tumor necrosis factor-cc, interleukin (IL)-10, and IL-6 mRNA expression 24 hours after injury. Lipopolysaccharide administered 5 (but not 9) days before injury increased the expression of CD11b (233%) and of interferon beta (500%) in uninjured mice, while it reduced the expression of CD68 (by 46%) and increased that of IL-6 (by 52%) in injured mice. Lipopolysaccharide preconditioning conferred a long-lasting neuroprotection after TBI, which was associated with a modulation of microglia/macrophages activity and cytokine production. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2011) 31, 1919-1929; doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2011.42; published online 6 April 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available