4.6 Article

The metabolomic profile during isoflurane anesthesia differs from propofol anesthesia in the live rodent brain

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 1432-1442

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.1

Keywords

anesthesia; brain; in vivo; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; metabolomics; rat

Funding

  1. New York State Foundation for Science, Technology and Innovation (NYSTAR), NIH [K30]
  2. NCRR [1S10RR025515-01]
  3. Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of noninvasive techniques to discover new biomarkers in the live brain is important to further understand the underlying metabolic pathways of significance for processes such as anesthesia-induced apoptosis and cognitive dysfunction observed in the undeveloped brain. We used in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and two different signal processing approaches to test the hypothesis that volatile (isoflurane) and intravenous (propofol) anesthetics at equipotent doses produce distinct metabolomic profiles in the hippocampus and parietal cortex of the live rodent. For both brain regions, prolonged isoflurane anesthesia was characterized by higher levels of lactate (Lac) and glutamate compared with long-lasting propofol. In contrast, propofol anesthesia was characterized by very low concentrations of Lac ([lac]) as well as glucose. Quantitative analysis revealed that the [lac] was fivefold higher with isoflurane compared with propofol anesthesia and independent of [lac] in blood. The metabolomic profiling further demonstrated that for both brain regions, Lac was the most important metabolite for the observed differences, suggesting activation of distinct metabolic pathways that may impact mechanisms of action, background cellular functions, and possible agent-specific neurotoxicity. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2011) 31, 1432-1442; doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2011.1;published online 26 January 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available