4.6 Article

A spectral analysis approach for determination of regional rates of cerebral protein synthesis with the L-[1-11C]leucine PET method

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 1460-1476

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.26

Keywords

brain; kinetic analysis; leucine; positron emission tomography

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A spectral analysis approach was used to estimate kinetic model parameters of the L-[1-C-11] leucine positron emission tomography (PET) method and regional rates of cerebral protein synthesis (rCPS) in predefined regions of interest (ROIs). Unlike analyses based on the assumption that tissue ROIs are kinetically homogeneous, spectral analysis allows for heterogeneity within a region. To improve estimation performance, a new approach was developed-spectral analysis with iterative filter (SAIF). In simulation SAIF produced low bias, low variance estimates of the influx rate constant for leucine (K-1), blood volume fraction (V-b), fraction of unlabeled leucine in the tissue precursor pool for protein synthesis derived from arterial plasma (lambda), and rCPS. Simulation of normal count rate studies showed that SAIF applied to ROI time-activity curves (TACs) performed comparably to the basis function method (BFM) applied to voxel TACs when voxelwise estimates were averaged over all voxels in the ROI. At low count rates, however, SAIF performed better. In measured L-[1-C-11] leucine PET data, there was good agreement between ROI-based SAIF estimates and average voxelwise BFM estimates of K-1, V-b, lambda, and rCPS. We conclude that SAIF sufficiently addresses the problem of tissue heterogeneity in ROI data and provides a valid tool for estimation of rCPS, even in low count rate studies. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2010) 30, 1460-1476; doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.26; published online 3 March 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available