4.6 Article

Energetics of inhibition: insights with a computational model of the human GABAergic neuron-astrocyte cellular complex

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 30, Issue 11, Pages 1834-1846

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.107

Keywords

Bayesian inference; flux balance analysis; GABA-glutamine cycle; GABA synthesis; glutamine transfer; multicompartment model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate metabolic interactions between astrocytes and GABAergic neurons at steady states corresponding to different activity levels using a six-compartment model and a new methodology based on Bayesian statistics. Many questions about the energetics of inhibition are still waiting for definite answers, including the role of glutamine and lactate effluxed by astrocytes as precursors for c-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and whether metabolic coupling applies to the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. Our identification and quantification of metabolic pathways describing the interaction between GABAergic neurons and astrocytes in connection with the release of GABA makes a contribution to this important problem. Lactate released by astrocytes and its neuronal uptake is found to be coupled with neuronal activity, unlike glucose consumption, suggesting that in astrocytes, the metabolism of GABA does not require increased glycolytic activity. Negligible glutamine trafficking between the two cell types at steady state questions glutamine as a precursor of GABA, not excluding glutamine cycling as a transient dynamic phenomenon, or a prominent role of GABA reuptake. Redox balance is proposed as an explanation for elevated oxidative phosphorylation and adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis in astrocytes, decoupled from energy requirements. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2010) 30, 1834-1846; doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2010.107; published online 28 July 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available