4.5 Article

Differential activity and expression of antioxidant enzymes and alteration in osmolyte accumulation under high temperature stress in wheat seedlings

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 653-659

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2014.05.004

Keywords

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) seedling; High temperature stress; Antioxidant enzyme; Gene expression

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China [201203029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of high temperature (HT) stress on activity and expression of antioxidant enzymes and osmotic adjustment substance content in seedlings of four wheat cultivars with contrasting levels of HT tolerance. The results showed that the differences in superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, glutathione reductase (GR) activity, soluble protein content and praline content between HT-resistant cultivars and HT-sensitive cultivars were more obvious than those in the activities of peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT). Moreover, the transcript levels of Fe-SOD and Mn-SOD were consistent with the trend of variation in SOD activity, which suggested that Fe-SOD and Mn-SOD might play important roles in SOD activity under HT stress. Finally, the transcript levels of CAT and GR were more sensitive than the activities of CAT and GR in response to HT stress in wheat seedlings. Collectively, our results indicated that HT-resistant wheat cultivars had higher SOD activity, GR activity and praline content than HT-sensitive wheat cultivars under HT stress. These data indicated that HT-resistant wheat cultivars resisted the damage caused by HT stress more effectively, which could be applied in predicting HT-resistant wheat cultivars used for field production. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available