4.5 Article

Avenin diversity analysis of the genus Avena (oat). Relevance for people with celiac disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 170-177

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2013.03.017

Keywords

Gluten-free; Celiac disease; R5 antibody; G12 antibody

Funding

  1. Celiac Disease Consortium
  2. Dutch Government [BSIK03009]
  3. Ministry of Economic Affairs [KB05-001-019, KB05-003-032, KB15-001-007]
  4. Europees Fonds voor Regionale Ontwikkeling (EFRO)
  5. European Union
  6. province Gelderland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oat is widely consumed by people with celiac disease (CD). Its safety has been disputed because two peptides from oat avenins can be recognized as T cell epitopes by some CD patients. Differential signals of gluten-specific monoclonal antibodies and in-vitro T cells to oat varieties have suggested the existence of differences in immunogenicity. We aimed to clarify the nature of such responses by cloning avenin genes from 13 Avena species. A single oat plant contained up to 10 avenin genes. Avenin proteins clustered in four groups of which two contained the two avenin CD epitopes. All Avena species examined harbored avenins of these two groups, and as a consequence all contained avenins with the two avenin-specific epitopes, which makes it very unlikely to find oat cultivars that are devoid of these sequences. The established gluten epitopes from wheat, rye and barley were not present in oat avenins; some variants with two and three amino acid substitutions occurred, but they were predicted not to resist proteolysis in the gastro-intestinal tract. Perfect recognition sites of antibodies R5 and G12 were also not present in avenins. Thus, their signals to oat should not be interpreted as differences in immunogenicity for CD patients. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available