4.5 Article

Formation of grain chalkiness and changes in water distribution in developing rice caryopses grown under high-temperature stress

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 166-174

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.04.011

Keywords

Grain chalkiness; High-temperature stress; Magnetic resonance imaging; Rice

Funding

  1. National Agricultural and Food Research Organization (NARO), Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-temperature stress during grain ripening facilitates the formation of chalky grains through loose packing of amyloplasts. In the present study, the changes in water distribution in the developing caryopses by high-temperature stress were investigated by magnetic resonance imaging. Milky-white and white-cored types of chalky grains, which had chalkiness around the centre of the endosperm, were formed in a high percentage in a high-temperature condition by the middle dry-matter accumulating stage. Magnetic resonance images of the early stage caryopses in the high-temperature condition showed a lower water content around the centre of the endosperm, where the disorganized development of amyloplasts was observed by scanning electron microscopy. Transcripts for alpha-amylase were, however, not detected there in the early and middle stage, indicating that starch degradation by alpha-amylase was not the cause of the formation of these types of chalky grains. In the middle stage, water content in the central chalky part became higher than in the lateral translucent part. Loose packing of amyloplasts in the chalky part may allow pooling of water in the free spaces leading to the higher water content after the middle stage. Together with the results, the physiological mechanism for the formation of white-cored and milky-white grains that occurred by high-temperature stress was discussed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available