4.5 Article

Association analysis reveals effects of wheat glutenin alleles and rye translocations on dough-mixing properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 283-290

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.06.008

Keywords

Glutenin subunits; End-use quality; Wheat; Association mapping

Funding

  1. Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station, USDA-CSREES Special Research [2003-34205-13636, 2006-34205-17358]
  2. Ford Foundation International Fellowships Program
  3. Colorado Wheat Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The glutenin loci of wheat (Triticum aestivum L) are important determinants of bread-making quality, although the effects of alleles at those loci are incompletely understood. We applied an association analysis method to assess the effects of glutenin alleles and 1RS wheat-rye (Secale cereale L) translocations on dough-mixing properties in 96 wheat cultivars and advanced lines grown at three Colorado locations while accounting for population structure and relatedness of individuals in the population. The results indicated that (1) in the majority of cases, controlling relatedness of individuals reduced the significance of associations between glutenin loci and Mixograph traits; (2) the Glu-D1 and Glu-B3 loci and 1RS translocations had greater impacts on dough-mixing properties compared to other glutenin loci; (3) Glu-B1w, Glu-D1d, and Glu-B3b were consistently associated with greater (more favorable) Mixograph peak time (MPT) than other alleles at the respective loci, whereas Glu-B1e, Glu-D1a, and Glu-B3c were associated with reduced MPT; (4) the 1BL1 RS translocation was associated with a decrease in Mixograph properties. Our results indicate that taking multiple-level relatedness of individuals into account can improve the results of association analysis for wheat-quality traits. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available