4.2 Article

Diagnostic value of combined assessment of olfaction and sustantia nigra hyperechogenicity for Parkinson's disease

Journal

NEUROLOGIA
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 496-501

Publisher

ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2014.03.010

Keywords

Diagnostic markers; Parkinson's disease; Olfactory dysfunction; Transcranial sonography; Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Hyposmia and substantia nigra hyperechogenicity (SN+) are characteristic markers of Parkinson's disease (PD), although their diagnostic value in isolation may be limited. We evaluated the combined prevalence of both disorders in patients diagnosed with PD and assessed their diagnostic yield compared to a sample with essential tremor (ET) and another group of healthy subjects. Methods: Patients diagnosed with PD and ET and treated in our outpatient clinic were enrolled. Olfaction was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks odour identification test (SS-12) and hyperechogenicity of the substantia nigra (SN+) was assessed by transcranial duplex ultrasound. Results: A total of 98 subjects were analysed, comprising 30 with PD, 21 with ET, and 47 controls. The respective prevalence rates of hyposmia (SS-12 < 8) and SN+ (area >.24 cm(2)) were 70% and 83.3% in PD, 33.3% and 9.5% in ET, and 17% and 10.6% in controls. Both markers were present in 63% of patients with PD, none of the patients with ET, and only 2 of the controls. Conclusions: Combined use of substantia nigra sonography and olfactory testing with SS-12, two rapid, safe, and accessible tests, was more specific than each isolated marker for distinguishing patients with PD from patients with ET and control subjects. Since both markers have been described in very early phases of PD, combined use may be helpful in providing early diagnosis of PD. (C) 2013 Sociedad Espanola de Neurologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available