4.7 Article

Alternative splicing of nav1.5: An electrophysiological comparison of 'Neonatal' and Adult isoforms and critical involvement of a lysine residue

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 216, Issue 3, Pages 716-726

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.21451

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In developmentally regulated D1:S3 splicing of Nav 1.5, there are 31 nucleotidle differences between the 5'-exon ('neonatal') and the 3'-exon ('adult') forms, resulting in 7 amino acid differences in D1:S3-S3/S4 linker. In particular, splicing replaces a conserved negative aspartate residue in the 'adult' with a positive lysine. Here, 'neonatal' and 'adult' Nav 1.5 alpha-subunit splice variants were stably transfected into EBNA-293 cells and their electrophysiological properties investigated by whole-cell patch-clamp recording. Compared with the 'adult' isoform, the 'neonatal' channel exhibited ( 1) a depolarized threshold of activation and voltage at which the current peaked; (2) much slower kinetics of activation and inactivation; (3) 50% greater transient charge (Na+) influx; (4) a stronger voltage dependence of time to peak; and (5) a slower recovery from inactivation. Tetroclotoxin sensitivity and VGSC beta 1-4 mRNA expression levels did not change. The significance of the charge-reversing aspartate to lysine substitution was investigated by mutating the lysine in the 'neonatal' channel back to aspartate. In this 'neonatal K2IID' mutant, the electrophysiological parameters studied strongly shifted back towards the 'adult', that is the lysine residue was primarily responsible for the electrophysio logical effects of Nav 1.5 D1:S3 splicing. Taken together, these data suggest that the charge reversal in 'neonatal' Nav 1.5 would (1) modify the channel kinetics and (2) prolong the resultant current, allowing greater intracellular Na(+)influx. Developmental and pathophysiological consequences of such differences are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available