4.7 Article

Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the healthy cervical spinal cord in vivo

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages 590-601

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.045

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UCL Grand Challenges scheme, an initiative of the UCL School of Life and Medical Sciences
  2. UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre
  3. Specialist Biomedical Research Centres at Moorfields/UCL and Great Ormond Street/UCL
  4. UK MS Society [892/08]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  6. EPSRC [EP/I027084/1, EP/L022680/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I027084/1, EP/L022680/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. International Spinal Research Trust [IMG006] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we present the application of neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) to the healthy spinal cord in vivo. NODDI provides maps such as the intra-neurite tissue volume fraction (v(in)), the orientation dispersion index (ODI) and the isotropic volume fraction (v(iso)), and here we investigate their potential for spinal cord imaging. We scanned five healthy volunteers, four of whom twice, on a 3 T MRI system with a ZOOM-EPI sequence. In accordance to the published NODDI protocol, multiple b-shells were acquired at cervical level and both NODDI and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics were obtained and analysed to: i) characterise differences in grey and white matter (GM/WM); ii) assess the scan-rescan reproducibility of NODDI; iii) investigate the relationship between NODDI and DTI; and iv) compare the quality of fit of NODDI and DTI. Our results demonstrated that: i) anatomical features can be identified in NODDI maps, such as clear contrast between GM and WM in ODI; ii) the variabilities of v(in) and ODI are comparable to that of DTI and are driven by biological differences between subjects for ODI, have similar contribution from measurement errors and biological variation for v(in), whereas v(iso) shows higher variability, driven by measurement errors; iii) NODDI identifies potential sources contributing to DTI indices, as in the brain; and iv) NODDI outperforms DTI in terms of quality of fit. In conclusion, this work shows that NODDI is a useful model for in vivo diffusion MRI of the spinal cord, providing metrics closely related to tissue microstructure, in line with findings in the brain. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available