4.7 Article

Accurate automatic estimation of total intracranial volume: A nuisance variable with less nuisance

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages 366-372

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.034

Keywords

Intracranial volume; Statistical Parametric Mapping; SPM; Freesurfer; Evaluation; Alzheimer's disease; TIV; ICV

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/J014257/1]
  2. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative [IRC-2AGO36535]
  3. Alzheimer's Research UK Senior Research Fellowship [ARUK SRF2013-15]
  4. US National Institutes of Health [R01 DC12519, R01 DC10367, R01 AG37491]
  5. Alzheimer's Association [NIRG-12-242215]
  6. Alzheimer's Research UK [ARUK 2014 NC-UCL]
  7. Brain Research Trust [EQU121301]
  8. Wolfson Foundation
  9. NIHR Queen Square Dementia Biomedical Research Unit
  10. Wellcome Trust [091593/Z/10/Z]
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG037491] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  12. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [R01DC012519, R01DC010367] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  13. Alzheimers Research UK [ARUK-SRF2013-5] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. Medical Research Council [MR/J014257/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10123, NF-SI-0513-10134] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. MRC [MR/J014257/2, MR/J014257/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Total intracranial volume (TIV/ICV) is an important covariate for volumetric analyses of the brain and brain regions, especially in the study of neurodegenerative diseases, where it can provide a proxy of maximum pre-morbid brain volume. The gold-standard method is manual delineation of brain scans, but this requires careful work by trained operators. We evaluated Statistical Parametric Mapping 12 (SPM12) automated segmentation for TIV measurement in place of manual segmentation and also compared it with SPM8 and FreeSurfer 5.3.0. For T1-weighted MRI acquired from 288 participants in a multi-centre clinical trial in Alzheimer's disease we find a high correlation between SPM12 TIV and manual TIV (R-2 = 0.940, 95% Confidence Interval (0.924, 0.953)), with a small mean difference (SPM12 40.4 +/- 35.4 ml lower than manual, amounting to 2.8% of the overall mean TIV in the study). The correlation with manual measurements (the key aspect when using TIV as a covariate) for SPM12 was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than for either SPM8 (R-2 = 0.577 CI (0.500, 0.644)) or FreeSurfer (R-2 = 0.801 CI (0.744, 0.843)). These results suggest that SPM12 TIV estimates are an acceptable substitute for labour-intensive manual estimates even in the challenging context of multiple centres and the presence of neurodegenerative pathology. We also briefly discuss some aspects of the statistical modelling approaches to adjust for TIV. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available