4.6 Article

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Differential Proteins in the Stroma of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Normal Nasopharyngeal Epithelial Tissue

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages 570-579

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.22028

Keywords

NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA; STROMA; LASER CAPTURE MICRODISSECTION; 2-D DIGE; CARCINOGENESIS

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China
  2. Ministry of Education of China
  3. Hibiscus Scholars of Hunan Province, China
  4. Science and Technology Committee of Hunan, China
  5. Public Health Bureau of Hunan Province, China
  6. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [2001CB510207, 2002-48, 2007-362, 04XK1001-1, 05SK1004-1, Z02-04, 30500558, 30670990, 2007-70]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of stromal cells and the factors that they expressed during cancer initiation and progression have been highlighted by recent literature. To identify the stromal proteins involved in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) carcinogenesis, we assessed differences in protein expression of the stroma from NPC and normal nasopharyngeal epithelium tissues (NNET) using a quantitative proteomic approach combined with laser capture microdissection (LCM). LCM was performed to purify stromal cells from the NPC and NNET, respectively. The differential proteins between the pooled microdissected tumor and normal stroma were analyzed by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) combined with mass spectrometry (MS). Twenty differential proteins were identified, and the expression and location of two differential proteins (L-plastin and S100A9) were further confirmed by Western blotting and immunohistochemical analysis. Our results will be helpful to study the role of stroma in the NPC carcinogenesis, as well as discover the interaction between NPC cells and their surrounding microenvironment. J. Cell. Biochem. 106: 570-579, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available