4.6 Article

Effects of Low Dose Quercetin: Cancer Cell-Specific Inhibition of Cell Cycle Progression

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 73-82

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.21977

Keywords

QUERCETIN; CELL CYCLE; p21; CYCLIN B1; Chk2; DNA DAMAGE

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute
  2. National Institutes of Health [CA95191, CA96989, CA121395]
  3. DOD Prostate Program [PC020530, PC040833]
  4. Breast Cancer Foundation [BCTR60306]
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA095191, R01CA096989, R03CA121395] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quercetin is a flavonoid present in many vegetables, fruits, and beverages. Due to its anti-oxidant, anti-tumor, and anti-inflammatory activity, quercetin has been studied extensively as a chemoprevention agent in several cancer models. Since most of these studies used higher doses of quercetin than clinically achievable, we focused on the effectiveness of physiologically relevant (loses of quercetin. A low dose of quercetin exerted cancer cell-specific inhibition of proliferation and this inhibition resulted from cell cycle arrest at the G I phase. Quercetin induced p21 CDK inhibitor with a concomitant decrease of phosphorylation of pRb, which inhibits the G(1)/S cell cycle progression by trapping E2F1. A low dose of quercetin induced mild DNA damage and Chk2 activation, which is the main regulator of p21 expression by quercetin. In addition, quercetin down-regulated the cyclin B1 and CDK1, essential components of G(2)/M Cell cycle progression. Inhibition of the recruitment of key transcription factor NF-Y to cyclin B1 gene promoter by quercetin led to transcriptional inhibition. This study proved that the chemo-preventive efficacy of a physiologically relevant dose of quercetin can be achievable through the inhibition of cell cycle progression. J. Cell. Biochem. 106: 73-82, 2009. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available