4.7 Article

Daily iTBS worsens hand motor training - A combined TMS, fMRI and mirror training study

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages 257-265

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.022

Keywords

TMS; TBS; Theta burst stimulation; fMRI; Neuroplasticity; Motor training

Funding

  1. Center for Sepsis and Control and Care (CSCC) - German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01 E0 1002. E]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used to increase regional excitability to improve motor function in combination with training after neurological diseases or events such as stroke. We investigated whether a daily application of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS; a short-duration rTMS that increases regional excitability) improves the training effect compared with sham stimulation in association with a four-day hand training program using a mirror (mirror training, MT). The right dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC(right)) was chosen as the target region for iTBS because this region has recently been emphasized as a node within a network related to MT. Methods: Healthy subjects were randomized into the iTBS group or sham group (control group CG). In the iTBS group, iTBS was applied daily over dPMC(right), which was functionally determined in an initial fMRI session prior to starting MT. MT involved 20 min of hand training daily in a mirror over four days. The hand tests, the intracortical excitability and fMRI were evaluated prior to and at the end of MT. Results: The results of the hand training tests of the iTBS group were surprisingly significantly poorer compared with those from the CG group. Both groups showed a different course of excitability in both M1 and a different course of fMRI activation within the supplementary motor area and M1(left). Conclusion: We suggest the inter-regional functional balance was affected by daily iTBS over dPMCright. Maybe an inter-regional connectivity within a network is differentially balanced. An excitability increase within an inhibitory-balanced network would therefore disturb the underlying network. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available