4.5 Review

Blood markers of oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages 2291-2300

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01585.x

Keywords

Alzheimer disease; blood markers; oxidative stress; lipid peroxidation

Funding

  1. Internal Grant Agency of the Ministry of Health [NS10331]
  2. Grant Agency of Charles University [74308, 604912]
  3. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [309/09/1053, 303/09/P049]
  4. European Regional Development Fund - Project FNUSA-ICRC [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alzheimer's disease (AD) represents a highly common form of dementia, but can be diagnosed in the earlier stages before dementia onset. Early diagnosis is crucial for successful therapeutic intervention. The introduction of new diagnostic biomarkers for AD is aimed at detecting underlying brain pathology. These biomarkers reflect structural or biochemical changes related to AD. Examination of cerebrospinal fluid has many drawbacks; therefore, the search for sensitive and specific blood markers is ongoing. Investigation is mainly focused on upstream processes, among which oxidative stress in the brain is of particular interest. Products of oxidative stress may diffuse into the blood and evaluating them can contribute to diagnosis of AD. However, results of blood oxidative stress markers are not consistent among various studies, as documented in this review. To find a specific biochemical marker for AD, we should concentrate on specific metabolic products formed in the brain. Specific fluorescent intermediates of brain lipid peroxidation may represent such candidates as the composition of brain phospholipids is unique. They are small lipophilic molecules and can diffuse into the blood stream, where they can then be detected. We propose that these fluorescent products are potential candidates for blood biomarkers of AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available